Saturday, February 5, 2011

Nasa


1 - 7 of 105 posts. Total pages: 15     Go To
The Curious Case of Lake Superior's Shrinking Cloud Street Droplets
 Posted on Feb 04, 2011 10:56:20 AM | Adam Voiland  0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
Parallel lines of cumulus clouds often appear when frigid, dry winds rush over comparatively warm bodies of water. NASA satellites have observed the striking cloud formations – which atmospheric scientists call “cloud streets” -- over the Hudson Bay, Greenland Sea, Bering Sea, and the Amery Ice Shelf a number of times in the past.
Recently, University of Wisconsin scientist Steve Ackerman was combing through data from NASA’s MODIS instrument as part of an effort to catalog and classify different cloud types. Something about the street clouds in this image of Lake Superior (above) struck him as peculiar. We caught up with him during a poster session at an American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco to find out more.
WoE: What are we looking at here?
Ackerman: These are cloud streets. They’re really quite interesting clouds. They occur when you get cold air blowing over warm water. You get them frequently over the Great Lakes and off the East Coast as well.
WoE: What was it about this particular cloud street set that you found notable?
Ackerman: We actually looked at a series of these, and what we found was that the clouds start small, grow in altitude, get thicker optically, and then do something quite strange and unexpected.
WoE: Strange and unexpected? Please explain…
Ackerman: Yes, often what happens is that the size of the cloud droplets grow as we’d expect at first, but then partway across the lake the size of the particles starts to decrease.
WoE: And that’s surprising?
Ackerman: Yes, we have no idea why they’d do that. They should be getting progressively bigger as they move across the lake and pick up moisture.
WoE: About how big are these cloud droplets, and how do they change over time?
Ackerman: They start off at about 5 microns. (For reference, human hair is about 100 microns.) They grow up to about 20 microns, and then they drop down to 10 microns.
WoE: How long does that process take?
Ackerman: About four hours.
WoE: Why do think it’s happening? 
Ackerman: We’re really not sure. Perhaps dry air is coming in from above.
WoE: Is this the only time you’ve observed this phenomenon?
Ackerman: It’s pretty rare. We found it in the MODIS imagery in the five years that we looked about 15 times.
WoE: What makes a peculiar phenomenon like this worth studying?
Ackerman: The next step is to work with cloud modelers and to see if they’re modeling things well enough to explain what’s going on. If the models can’t recreate unusual events like these cloud streets, we know they’re not getting things right. We need models to get the global climate right, and also the weather prediction right. 
The top image comes from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS).  The other two images are courtesy of Steve Ackerman.
--Adam Voiland, NASA's Earth Science News Team
Snow Views
 Posted on Feb 04, 2011 10:45:57 AM | Adam Voiland  0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
What on Earth was that? It may have looked like an amoeba, but it's actually a microscopic view of a wind-blown snowflake as viewed by a scanning electron microscope. Scientists in the Electron Microscopy Unit at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, which is just up the road from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, captured the image. Scientists at Goddard typically study snow from above using satellite instruments that fly high above the surface. Despite their differences, both perspectives offer views of bewildering beauty.  See more microscopic snow crystal imagery here
Satellite imagery courtesy of the NASA Earth Observatory.  Snowflake imagery courtesy of the USDA.

--Adam Voiland, NASA's Earth Science News Team
A Moment for Glory
 Posted on Jan 20, 2011 11:30:03 PM | Adam Voiland  0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
If you experience difficulty viewing this slideshow, you can also view it here.
NASA held a press conference about its soon-to-launch Glory satellite on January 20 in Washington, DC. The  mission will advance understanding of the energy budget and climate change by taking critical measurements of aerosols and total solar irradiance.
Want to learn more about Glory? Read an overview of the mission, view one of these two image galleries, brush up on aerosol science, take a look at this Q & A (pdf), follow along on Twitter, or browse the mission websites. Also, see what Nature, Discovery, and SpaceFlight Now have to say about Glory.
--Adam Voiland, NASA's Earth Science News Team
What on Earth is That #7
 Posted on Dec 23, 2010 11:02:44 AM | Adam Voiland 6 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
What on Earth is That?
(Check back after the New Year for the answer)
Here's the question from last time
And a time before that And that And..
Why Cutting Black Carbon Emissions May Save Arctic Sea Ice
 Posted on Dec 22, 2010 02:03:53 PM | Adam Voiland  0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
Arctic sea ice is retreating at an unexpectedly rapid pace. Average ice extent in September has declined by 11.5 percent per decade relative to the 1979 to 2000 average, according to satellite measurements of the ice. Many climatologists expect that the Arctic will be ice-free during the summer in as few as thirty years if current trends continue.
Most scientists who study the issue closely agree that reducing carbon dioxide emissions is the key to stabilizing Earth's climate. However, even if nations began curbing emissions immediately the world would continue to warm for many decades. While Earth can reabsorb some portion of carbon dioxide emissions fairly rapidly, a significant amount of carbon will remain in the atmosphere for long periods. Some 20 percent of carbon dioxide emissions are expected to remain in the atmosphere for tens of thousands of years, according to some estimates.
That doesn’t bode well for the dwindling Arctic sea ice.
However, if Mark Jacobson, an atmospheric scientist from Stanford University is right, there may still be hope for Arctic sea ice and the ecosystem it supports. Jacobson studies the climate effects of tiny airborne particles called black carbon, a scientific term for soot, the black stuff in smoke. Wood, dried animal dung, and other biofuels all produce black carbon when burned.  And fossil fuels, such as coal and petroleum, are especially prolific producers of the particles.
Under a microscope, black carbon is an amorphously-shaped particle with a branching globular shape. What’s most notable about black carbon, however, is the many ways that it can warm the climate. Black carbon particles, which unsurprisingly tend to be a coal black color, warm the air directly by absorbing sunlight and converting it into infrared radiation. They also reduce the reflectivity of the surface when deposited on icy surfaces. And they infiltrate cloud droplets in ways that can cause clouds to dissipate more quickly than they otherwise might.
Together such effects can produce a potent warming effect. Last week, during a session focused on black carbon at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco, Jacobson reminded meeting attendees of a bit of news that Stanford released a few months back. Reducing soot emissions may be the fastest method – indeed the only way -- of saving the Arctic ice, Jacobson noted. “On average black carbon particles stay in the air for just four or five days, so reducing emissions has an immediate impact,” he said in an interview later. “That’s not the case for greenhouse gases.”
Recent modeling, conducted by Jacobson and funded in-part by NASA, suggests that eliminating soot emissions from fossil fuel and biofuel burning over the next fifteen years could reduce Arctic warming by up to 1.7 °C (3 °F). Net warming in the Arctic, in comparison, has been about 2.5 °C (4.5 °F) over the last century.
--Adam Voiland, NASA's Earth Science News Team
Snapshots from AGU
 Posted on Dec 17, 2010 01:00:42 PM | Adam Voiland  0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
--Video Courtesy of NASA TV
Behold: A Chirping, Pulsating Norwegian Aurora
 Posted on Dec 16, 2010 01:03:32 PM | Adam Voiland  0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
What on Earth was that sound? Jungle birds? Monkeys? Sirens?
Combined with the movie of swirling lights you might even have guessed some kind of spacecraft launch or radio tower. 
In fact, both the sound and image are of completely natural origin. The movie shows what's known as a pulsating aurora – a very common, but hard to see, weak aurora that blinks on and off up to 12 times per minute in the night sky.
The sound is of something no one knew was connected to these auroras until recently: a special kind of electromagnetic wave some 40,000 km higher in Earth's magnetosphere called a chorus wave, since it sounds like birds chirping when played through a speaker. 
How the pulsating auroras form has long been a mystery. Stable auroras form when electrons and ionized particles from the solar wind travel down magnetic field lines towards Earth. These collide with nitrogen and oxygen particles in the ionosphere, some100 km above Earth, and the collisions send out blue, green, and red photons to create the colorful light shows of the aurora. 
But no one knew what could cause an aurora to turn into a strobe light until scientists at UCLA looked at data from NASA's THEMIS spacecraft. They discovered that the auroras pulsed in sync to chorus waves far above Earth's atmosphere. The chorus waves apparently drive the light-inducing solar wind particles down to Earth following its own unique beat. 
Linking the two phenomena does more than explain the origins of the pulsating aurora. Using the electromagnetic waves and the aurora to define end points of magnetic field lines gives scientists a new tool to physically map Earth's constantly changing magnetic field. Knowing the way that the magnetic field moves, in turn, is crucial for understanding space weather and phenomena that can threaten Earth-observing satellites.
Top Image: Pulsating aurora image taken on Oct 30, 2008 in Laukvik, Lofoten Islands, Norway. Courtesy of Jan Koeman. Middle Image: A snapshot of the pulsating aurora taken by a ground-based camera. The black square in the middle is the THEMIS spacecraft. Bottom Image: Schematic diagram showing aurora over North America and spacecraft in space (magenta) embedded in the energetic plasma source (blue cloud). These two regions are connected by the Earth's magnetic field line. Energetic plasma interacts with waves (red) and precipitate into the upper atmosphere (blue arrows) and generate aurora. The geometry of the plasma cloud determines the aurora shape. Courtesy of Toshi Nishimura

No comments:

Post a Comment